|
A Sikh athelete |
The
other day, Sheila was asking whether there is a gay Indian scene in Singapore.
Predictably, the response was poor, probably an indicator of disinterest. Today
Anne asked about why dark skin is at the bottom of the desirability stakes in
Singapore. All nationalities have positive and negative feelings about others.
Elderly Europeans haven’t forgiven the Germans for two world wars; the Greeks
have few warm feelings towards the Turks, and so on. Equally, almost everybody
has sexual preferences involving physiognomy, size, weight, age and indeed,
race. But in Singaporean gay sexual politics, is racial preference largely
determined by society’s deep rooted antipathies towards other races, which has
the effect of marginalising non-Chinese homosexual men and women?
We know what follows is a generalisation. It has
to be. There is little research on homosexuality in Singapore; one has to rely
on anecdotal evidence and one's own experience of belonging to a minority. We
believe that negative feelings amongst the Chinese population as a whole towards
minorities in Singapore, has influenced homosexual politics. There is no denying
that in everyday life, Indians and Malays are stereotyped to an extent that is
both derisive and insulting.
|
Thaipusam Hunk! |
On the whole, for those of other races on the
fringes of Chinese homosexual society, Singapore can be a lonely and frustrating
place. Indians "smell of curry or hair oil", they are
"black" and they are "hairy". Malays are likely to "ask
you for money" fairly early in a relationship or "rip you off."
They are "unreliable." Such stereotyping is not uncommon (it may be
the norm) when Chinese homosexual Singaporeans are asked their sexual opinions
of Indians and Malays. And while there will always be those who care about the
person rather than the packaging, Chinese homosexuals are quick to point out
that being black, hairy and Indian is a definite turn off. In the next breath
many will say that they might consider a North Indian or Pakistani because they
are "fairer".
|
A Sikh (North Indian) cruising at Little India MRT Station |
Homosexual and bisexual Singapore Indians (the
latter being far more numerous than the former) know this only too well since
they suffer constant rejection by the Chinese. To counter this (and to save
their pride) some Indians have internalised their own form of stereotyping the
Chinese. It goes something like "the Chinese are short, hairless, and have
small penises" the opposite of which Indians factor into their definition
of maturity and masculinity. One might therefore imagine that a status quo has
been reached. In fact, it is one race reacting to the stereotypes of the other
dominant and ruling race.
The consequences of this polarisation for Chinese
homosexuals are negligible. For Indians it is extremely significant. If, on the
whole, the Chinese of your choice are out of reach because they don't want you
or because you've internalised a pride-protecting mechanism, what choices do you
have? Other Indians? No and yes. Because the Indian community in Singapore is
small and cohesive (=kaypo) and because most Indian men who have sex with men
also have wives and children, there is a marked reluctance to have sex with each
other. Careless whispers and innuendo can lead to the destruction of marriage
and family and ostracism from a tightly knit community. Of course, there are
thousands of Indian and Bangladeshi migrant workers in Singapore who must count
as potential sex partners for local Indians. They do have sex with each other,
but on the whole the latter view themselves as having little in common with poor
migrant workers. This is not true for Indians from JB and Malaysia and Indian
immigrants newly arrived to write your software or run your polymer production
plant, since they are educated and culturally, have more in common. In fact,
there is quite a lot of coupling between Singapore and JB homosexual Indians
since there are few marriage ties between the two communities and because both
need to find partners outside their own communities. But, there is no getting
away from the fact that many Indian homosexuals live in a sexual limbo,
reluctant to cruise, spurned by the Chinese and not willing to risk losing
everything by teaming up with a local Indian. This then is one consequence of
negative stereotyping of an entire race in Singapore.
|
A Sikh foreign construction worker in Singapore is self-forced to earn money as gay prostitute in Serangoon Road |
Malays do not suffer as much as Indians for the
obvious reason that the majority of them are neither "black, hairy or
brylcreemed". They have a definite constituency amongst Chinese homosexuals
who in a positive light (or double whammy?) describe them as "clean"
or "light skinned". Nonetheless, the impression that Malays are after
your money or possessions and therefore untrustworthy, is not uncommon. Malays
though, have fewer problems finding sex partners amongst themselves in Singapore
and Malaysia. They can count on a reservoir of Chinese too.
But like Indians, Malays perceive a welcome
(certainly not cold rejection) from caucasians. And this has created another
perception amongst the Chinese that Malays (if they think of them at all) are
gold diggers, looking for sugar daddies in East/West bars such as Vincent's
Lounge. But then is it not a widely held opinion among Chinese homosexuals who
eschew Vincent's, that anybody who goes there is a sweet young gold digger
looking for a benefactor?
The Chinese/Caucasian debate on Signel, has
mostly been hostile to the Caucasian. He is the "transgressor"
seducing our "young Chinese youth". It's unclear if this is
xenophobia, superiority, racial stereotyping or plain jealousy. But it's obvious
that if Chinese homosexuals have a preference other than themselves, Caucasians
come far higher up the list than Indians and Malays. It’s true that Caucasians
in Singapore run after the Chinese. But this is not surprising given that they
are the most visible and accessible homosexual majority, owning and patronising
all the watering holes. Anyway, what’s the point of being posted to Singapore
if your preference is for your own kind or Zulus?
Do Indian lesbians suffer in the same way as
Indian gay men? We don’t know but are sure somebody will enlighten us.
Finally, to return to Sheila. There is a vibrant
and rather public cruising culture for young Indians, mostly unmarried, in
Singapore. Around Seranagoon Road from Teka market to Mustafa’s, are bus
stops, toilets, quiet side streets, a bar and boutiques where cruising and sex
takes place. On the whole, Indians cannot take their tricks home. Some rent
rooms by the hour in shabby Serangoon hotels. More common are public couplings
and group sex in dark corners, especially where redevelopment is taking place.
For a cooler cruise, there is a favourite shopping centre in Selegie Road. A
very few of the younger, better educated set, might venture to Fort Road beach.
|
Well hung Indian |
The plaza in front of Mustafas always looks like
a disorganised South Asian summit with Sikh, Punjabi, Hindi, Sinhala, Urdu, Persian, Bangla,
Nepali, Burmese and Mongolian speakers shouting to be heard. Within this chaos,
there is heavy cruising though to the untrained eye and ear, you’d never know.
Nepalis pair up with Mongolians and Burmese, Pakistanis take anything that’s
fuckable, Bengalis look for Bengalis. Some of the boys are rough trade. Most of
this happens from 10pm with the focus gradually shifting to 24hour kopitiams in
nearby lanes. Not many local Indians dare to be seen in the Plaza. The married
ones will venture to a favourite bar, but they get their contacts on the phone
and through friends, sometimes the family Hindu priest. The transvestite
prostitutes behind Desker road always attract a large, non-local, Indian
presence. Just look for the gawking crowd of lungi-wallahs near the cigarette
stall, and you’re there. Here, there is little stigma to be seen ogling
transvestites because they are "honourary women" as opposed to "gundus"
or "kothis".
|
Ray |
Is there anything else you’d like to know?
Mr & Mrs Pussy |